I wasn't saying that you were doing that. It is why I withhold judgment on so many political news stories (even on non-preferred presidents, etc.). I believe that they and their sources are, frequently, politically dishonest.
I didn't like Obama, but if his birth certificate was really an issue, it would have been settled in court. Disinformation only serves to convolute the political process at that level and all levels of society. It is intellectually dishonest and comes from the father of lies.
I am a fair tactician and can even strategize against a static objective, but I fall short as a dynamic strategist. I am fair at checkers, but lousy at chess. I am in no way qualified to criticize the POTUS in that regard.
His resume' recommends that he is adept at strategy, so I say just let him do his thing as long as it doesn't violate our Constitution* nor compels us to violate our own consciences.
*If someone can bring such a case against him, do it in a court of law. Otherwise, it is just empty slander/libel if it is only pitched to the "court" of public opinion. (And not worth my time.)
Again, understood Saber. Please keep commenting🙂
I wasn't saying that you were doing that. It is why I withhold judgment on so many political news stories (even on non-preferred presidents, etc.). I believe that they and their sources are, frequently, politically dishonest.
I didn't like Obama, but if his birth certificate was really an issue, it would have been settled in court. Disinformation only serves to convolute the political process at that level and all levels of society. It is intellectually dishonest and comes from the father of lies.
Agreed Saber, no worries🙂
I am a fair tactician and can even strategize against a static objective, but I fall short as a dynamic strategist. I am fair at checkers, but lousy at chess. I am in no way qualified to criticize the POTUS in that regard.
His resume' recommends that he is adept at strategy, so I say just let him do his thing as long as it doesn't violate our Constitution* nor compels us to violate our own consciences.
*If someone can bring such a case against him, do it in a court of law. Otherwise, it is just empty slander/libel if it is only pitched to the "court" of public opinion. (And not worth my time.)
I wonder what trolls did…
Quite possible in this context, Saber.